flag

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail, 2023 course map and altimetry

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: 2023 route, altimetry, gpx

Note: "Valle dei Segni Wine Trail" is NOT organized by goandrace.com

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail course map. Lenght: 55 km (34.2 mi).

55 km (34.2 mi) course map of the event "Valle dei Segni Wine Trail" in Darfo Boario Terme, in the Province of Brescia (Saturday, October 28, 2023). Explore the route!

Do you want to fly over the path with a Google Earth 3D video? Click on the following link: Valle dei Segni Wine Trail, fly over the path (3D video).

GPS track - .gpx file download

Download the gps race path by clicking here. You can send the .gpx file to your Garmin watch or other compatible device and follow the path. For instructions on how to upload the GPX file onto your Garmin watch click here.

 .gpx file download

NB: it is possible that the length calculated from the gpx file is greater than that of the race, with an error typically of 1-2%, so for example a half-marathon could be 2-300 meters longer.

Click the following link to visit the Valle dei Segni Wine Trail event page.

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: route altimetric information


Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: GNR-GAP index (v 1.0, experimental, see more)

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: interactive route

You can set the km (or mile) markers and you can select different types of layers (Satellite or Openstreetmap).

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: altimetry graph

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: slope graph

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: percentage distribution of slope

Valle dei Segni Wine Trail: Km by km route altimetry analysis

Lap Start Alt. End Alt. Diff. Alt. Aver. Slope Min Alt. Max Alt. Tot Climb Tot Descent
KM 0-1 362 398 +36 +3.6% 361 398 37 1
KM 1-2 398 416 +18 +1.8% 398 426 25 7
KM 2-3 416 414 -2 -0.2% 392 419 22 24
KM 3-4 414 379 -35 -3.5% 364 414 15 50
KM 4-5 379 468 +89 +8.9% 379 479 100 11
KM 5-6 468 442 -26 -2.6% 442 484 9 35
KM 6-7 442 428 -14 -1.4% 410 440 18 32
KM 7-8 428 371 -57 -5.7% 371 432 11 68
KM 8-9 371 385 +14 +1.4% 367 416 55 41
KM 9-10 385 345 -40 -4.0% 344 388 1 41
KM 10-11 345 361 +16 +1.6% 340 368 31 15
KM 11-12 361 429 +68 +6.8% 355 434 76 8
KM 12-13 429 417 -12 -1.2% 418 477 47 59
KM 13-14 417 388 -29 -2.9% 384 417 5 34
KM 14-15 388 393 +5 +0.5% 382 393 14 9
KM 15-16 393 386 -7 -0.7% 380 395 10 17
KM 16-17 386 434 +48 +4.8% 386 435 49 1
KM 17-18 434 406 -28 -2.8% 404 446 16 44
KM 18-19 406 304 -102 -10.2% 280 406 24 126
KM 19-20 304 383 +79 +7.9% 304 399 94 15
KM 20-21 383 393 +10 +1.0% 331 393 62 52
KM 21-22 393 472 +79 +7.9% 394 472 79 0
KM 22-23 472 570 +98 +9.8% 472 569 98 0
KM 23-24 570 492 -78 -7.8% 492 586 9 87
KM 24-25 492 503 +11 +1.1% 451 503 46 35
KM 25-26 503 388 -115 -11.5% 388 510 0 115
KM 26-27 388 270 -118 -11.8% 270 387 0 118
KM 27-28 270 329 +59 +5.9% 269 329 59 0
KM 28-29 329 464 +135 +13.5% 329 464 135 0
KM 29-30 464 559 +95 +9.5% 464 559 96 1
KM 30-31 559 634 +75 +7.5% 559 634 89 14
KM 31-32 634 652 +18 +1.8% 634 663 31 13
KM 32-33 652 540 -112 -11.2% 540 652 0 112
KM 33-34 540 516 -24 -2.4% 513 540 21 45
KM 34-35 516 691 +175 +17.5% 515 692 175 0
KM 35-36 691 672 -19 -1.9% 667 696 22 41
KM 36-37 672 632 -40 -4.0% 632 675 8 48
KM 37-38 632 524 -108 -10.8% 524 632 0 108
KM 38-39 524 428 -96 -9.6% 428 524 0 96
KM 39-40 428 283 -145 -14.5% 283 427 0 145
KM 40-41 283 341 +58 +5.8% 262 341 73 15
KM 41-42 341 345 +4 +0.4% 341 378 34 30
KM 42-43 345 300 -45 -4.5% 300 344 2 47
KM 43-44 300 357 +57 +5.7% 291 358 63 6
KM 44-45 357 532 +175 +17.5% 357 533 175 0
KM 45-46 532 415 -118 -11.8% 415 532 0 118
KM 46-47 415 335 -80 -8.0% 335 414 3 83
KM 47-48 335 454 +119 +11.9% 306 454 161 42
KM 48-49 454 537 +83 +8.3% 454 536 84 1
KM 49-50 537 475 -62 -6.2% 472 544 6 68
KM 50-51 475 477 +2 +0.2% 458 477 18 16
KM 51-52 477 400 -77 -7.7% 399 478 8 85
KM 52-53 400 343 -57 -5.7% 343 406 6 63
KM 53-54 343 234 -109 -10.9% 233 342 0 109
KM 54-55 234 236 +2 +0.2% 233 240 10 8

GNR-GAP index - Go&Race Algorithm Estimate

Based on the elevation profile analysis, running on this course is estimated to result in a pace that is 44.8% slower.


For example, a runner who maintains a pace of 5'00"/km (8'03"/mi) on a flat 55 km course, corresponding to a finish time of 4h35'01", is estimated to complete this course in 6h38'06". The recalculated average pace (GAP) improves to 7'14"/km (11'39"/mi), making it 2'14"/km (3'36"/mi) slower.


The following graph illustrates the Pace Adjustment (PA) factor applied to the pace along the course. The horizontal red line represents a PA of 1, meaning no pace adjustment. Above the line, the pace is slower; below the line, it is faster. The table below also provides estimates for other pace ranges.



Predict your race or analyze your performance!

This following table shows simulations for paces between 3 and 8'/km.


RACE PREDICTION
To estimate a possible race time, use the "Pace" or "Time without slopes" column, which are valid for a flat course.
For example, if you think you can cover this distance on a flat course at a pace of 4'40"/km (or 7'31"/mi), i.e. in a time of 4h16'41", the estimate is to complete this course in 6h11'33", corresponding to a pace of 6'45"/km (or 10'52"/mi).

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
If you have run this race, use the table to estimate the equivalent time on a flat course. Check the "GAP" column and find the value closest to your pace, or compare the "Time with slopes" column with your time: on the same row you will find the pace and the equivalent time on a flat course in the "Pace" and "Time without slopes" columns.
For example, a time of 5h58'17" (pace of 6'31"/km or 10'29"/mi) corresponds to a time of 4h07'31" on a flat course (pace of 4'30"/km or 7'15"/mi).

Pace (min/km) Pace (min/mile) Time without slopes (hh:mm:ss) Time with slopes (hh:mm:ss) GAP (min/km) Δ Pace (min/km) GAP (min/mile) Δ Pace (min/mile)
3'00"4'50"2h45'00"3h58'51"4'21"1'21"6'59"2'10"
3'10"5'06"2h54'10"4h12'08"4'35"1'25"7'23"2'17"
3'20"5'22"3h03'21"4h25'24"4'50"1'30"7'46"2'24"
3'30"5'38"3h12'31"4h38'40"5'04"1'34"8'09"2'31"
3'40"5'54"3h21'41"4h51'56"5'18"1'38"8'33"2'38"
3'50"6'10"3h30'51"5h05'13"5'33"1'43"8'56"2'46"
4'00"6'26"3h40'01"5h18'29"5'47"1'47"9'19"2'53"
4'10"6'42"3h49'11"5h31'45"6'02"1'52"9'42"3'00"
4'20"6'58"3h58'21"5h45'01"6'16"1'56"10'06"3'07"
4'30"7'15"4h07'31"5h58'17"6'31"2'01"10'29"3'14"
4'40"7'31"4h16'41"6h11'34"6'45"2'05"10'52"3'22"
4'50"7'47"4h25'51"6h24'50"6'60"2'10"11'16"3'29"
5'00"8'03"4h35'01"6h38'06"7'14"2'14"11'39"3'36"
5'10"8'19"4h44'11"6h51'22"7'29"2'19"12'02"3'43"
5'20"8'35"4h53'21"7h04'39"7'43"2'23"12'25"3'50"
5'30"8'51"5h02'31"7h17'55"7'58"2'28"12'49"3'58"
5'40"9'07"5h11'41"7h31'11"8'12"2'32"13'12"4'05"
5'50"9'23"5h20'51"7h44'27"8'27"2'37"13'35"4'12"
6'00"9'39"5h30'01"7h57'43"8'41"2'41"13'59"4'19"
6'10"9'55"5h39'11"8h11'00"8'56"2'46"14'22"4'26"
6'20"10'12"5h48'21"8h24'16"9'10"2'50"14'45"4'34"
6'30"10'28"5h57'31"8h37'32"9'25"2'55"15'09"4'41"
6'40"10'44"6h06'42"8h50'48"9'39"2'59"15'32"4'48"
6'50"10'60"6h15'52"9h04'05"9'53"3'03"15'55"4'55"
7'00"11'16"6h25'02"9h17'21"10'08"3'08"16'18"5'03"
7'10"11'32"6h34'12"9h30'37"10'22"3'12"16'42"5'10"
7'20"11'48"6h43'22"9h43'53"10'37"3'17"17'05"5'17"
7'30"12'04"6h52'32"9h57'09"10'51"3'21"17'28"5'24"
7'40"12'20"7h01'42"10h10'26"11'06"3'26"17'52"5'31"
7'50"12'36"7h10'52"10h23'42"11'20"3'30"18'15"5'39"
8'00"12'52"7h20'02"10h36'58"11'35"3'35"18'38"5'46"

Notes on the calculation of the length of the route, on the altimetry and on the slope

Note 1: the length of the route is calculated using the geographic coordinates of the points that compose it, thanks to a specific formula. This value may differ slightly from the official length declared by the organizers of the race, which is valid in case of discrepancies.
Note 2: the altimetry may not correspond exactly to the real values. For routes obtained via Google API, it is possible that the altitude is that of the terrain, without considering the presence of any tunnels or viaducts. If, however, the route was obtained from GPS tracking (for example with sports watches), the error is arbitrary and may depend both on the GPS coverage at the time it was recorded and on the performance of the device used.
Note 3: the percentage slope is found by calculating considering sections of at least 50 meters and is subsequently subjected to a "smoothing" process to reduce the possibility of artifacts and obtain a more realistic trend. For classification purposes, roads with gradients between -3% and +3% are considered flat, those with gradients between +3% and +7% are uphill, and those with gradients greater than +7% are considered steep. The same classification applies to descents. This classification is to be considered arbitrary and is a choice of goandrace.com.