flag

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024, course map and altimetry

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: route, altimetry, gpx

Note: "Chianti Ultra Trail 2024" is NOT organized by goandrace.com

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024 course map. Lenght: 15 km (9.3 mi).

On this page is shown the 15 km (9.3 mi) course map of the event "Chianti Ultra Trail 2024" in Radda in Chianti, in the Province of Siena (Saturday, March 23, 2024). Explore the route!

Do you want to fly over the path with a Google Earth 3D video? Click on the following link: Chianti Ultra Trail 2024, fly over the path (3D video).

Download the gps race path by clicking here. You can send the .gpx file to your Garmin watch or other compatible device and follow the path. For instructions on how to upload the GPX file onto your Garmin watch click here.
NB: it is possible that the length calculated from the gpx file is greater than that of the race, with an error typically of 1-2%, so for example a half-marathon could be 2-300 meters longer.

Click the following link to visit the Chianti Ultra Trail 2024 event page.

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: route altimetric information


Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: GNR-GAP index (v 1.0, experimental, see more)

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: interactive route

You can set the km (or mile) markers and you can select different types of layers (Satellite or Openstreetmap).

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: altimetry graph

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: slope graph

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: percentage distribution of slope

Chianti Ultra Trail 2024: Km by km route altimetry analysis

Lap Start Alt. End Alt. Diff. Alt. Aver. Slope Min Alt. Max Alt. Tot Climb Tot Descent
KM 0.0084-1 533 434 -99 -9.9% 426 534 3 102
KM 1-2 434 402 -33 -3.3% 401 437 3 36
KM 2-3 402 430 +29 +2.9% 386 430 44 16
KM 3-4 430 466 +36 +3.6% 432 482 64 28
KM 4-5 466 499 +32 +3.2% 467 505 50 18
KM 5-6 499 468 -31 -3.1% 468 521 21 52
KM 6-7 468 356 -112 -11.2% 356 467 0 112
KM 7-8 356 423 +67 +6.7% 357 419 67 0
KM 8-9 423 507 +83 +8.3% 425 504 86 3
KM 9-10 507 479 -28 -2.8% 475 521 14 42
KM 10-11 479 501 +22 +2.2% 474 507 29 7
KM 11-12 501 445 -56 -5.6% 441 512 11 67
KM 12-13 445 458 +13 +1.3% 428 458 28 15
KM 13-14 458 452 -7 -0.7% 420 459 31 38
KM 14-14.90 452 533 +81 +8.1% 442 534 4295 53

GNR-GAP index - Go&Race Algorithm Estimate

Based on the elevation profile analysis, running on this course is estimated to result in a pace that is 13.9% slower.

For example, a runner who maintains a pace of 5'00"/km (8'03"/mi) on a flat 14.86 km course, corresponding to a finish time of 1h14'18", is estimated to complete this course in 1h24'38". The recalculated average pace (GAP) improves to 5'42"/km (9'10"/mi), making it 0'42"/km (1'07"/mi) slower.


The following graph illustrates the Pace Adjustment (PA) factor applied to the pace along the course. The horizontal red line represents a PA of 1, meaning no pace adjustment. Above the line, the pace is slower; below the line, it is faster. The table below also provides estimates for other pace ranges.




ANALYZE YOUR PERFORMANCE!
This table shows the estimated times for paces between 3 and 6'/km.
Use the table to analyze your performance or plan your race by estimating your equivalent time on a flat course. Check the "GAP"column: find the value closest to your pace. Or compare the "Time with slopes" column with your time: on the same row you will find the equivalent pace and time on a flat course in the "Pace" and "Time without slopes" columns.
Example: a time of 1h16'10" (pace of 5'08"/km or 8'15"/mi) corresponds to a time of 1h06'52" on a flat course (pace of 4'30"/km or 7'15"/mi).

Pace (min/km) Pace (min/mile) Time without slopes (hh:mm:ss) Time with slopes (hh:mm:ss) GAP (min/km) Δ Pace (min/km) GAP (min/mile) Δ Pace (min/mile)
3'00"4'50"0h44'35"0h50'47"3'25"0'25"5'30"0'40"
3'10"5'06"0h47'03"0h53'36"3'36"0'26"5'48"0'43"
3'20"5'22"0h49'32"0h56'25"3'48"0'28"6'07"0'45"
3'30"5'38"0h52'01"0h59'15"3'59"0'29"6'25"0'47"
3'40"5'54"0h54'29"1h02'04"4'11"0'31"6'43"0'49"
3'50"6'10"0h56'58"1h04'53"4'22"0'32"7'02"0'51"
4'00"6'26"0h59'27"1h07'43"4'33"0'33"7'20"0'54"
4'10"6'42"1h01'55"1h10'32"4'45"0'35"7'38"0'56"
4'20"6'58"1h04'24"1h13'21"4'56"0'36"7'57"0'58"
4'30"7'15"1h06'52"1h16'10"5'08"0'38"8'15"1'00"
4'40"7'31"1h09'21"1h19'00"5'19"0'39"8'33"1'03"
4'50"7'47"1h11'50"1h21'49"5'30"0'40"8'52"1'05"
5'00"8'03"1h14'18"1h24'38"5'42"0'42"9'10"1'07"
5'10"8'19"1h16'47"1h27'28"5'53"0'43"9'28"1'09"
5'20"8'35"1h19'16"1h30'17"6'04"0'44"9'47"1'12"
5'30"8'51"1h21'44"1h33'06"6'16"0'46"10'05"1'14"
5'40"9'07"1h24'13"1h35'55"6'27"0'47"10'23"1'16"
5'50"9'23"1h26'41"1h38'45"6'39"0'49"10'42"1'18"
6'00"9'39"1h29'10"1h41'34"6'50"0'50"10'60"1'21"
6'10"9'55"1h31'39"1h44'23"7'01"0'51"11'18"1'23"
6'20"10'12"1h34'07"1h47'13"7'13"0'53"11'37"1'25"
6'30"10'28"1h36'36"1h50'02"7'24"0'54"11'55"1'27"
6'40"10'44"1h39'05"1h52'51"7'36"0'56"12'13"1'30"
6'50"10'60"1h41'33"1h55'41"7'47"0'57"12'32"1'32"
7'00"11'16"1h44'02"1h58'30"7'58"0'58"12'50"1'34"
7'10"11'32"1h46'31"2h01'19"8'10"0'60"13'08"1'36"
7'20"11'48"1h48'59"2h04'08"8'21"1'01"13'27"1'38"
7'30"12'04"1h51'28"2h06'58"8'33"1'03"13'45"1'41"
7'40"12'20"1h53'56"2h09'47"8'44"1'04"14'03"1'43"
7'50"12'36"1h56'25"2h12'36"8'55"1'05"14'22"1'45"
8'00"12'52"1h58'54"2h15'26"9'07"1'07"14'40"1'47"

Notes on the calculation of the length of the route, on the altimetry and on the slope

Note 1: the length of the route is calculated using the geographic coordinates of the points that compose it, thanks to a specific formula. This value may differ slightly from the official length declared by the organizers of the race, which is valid in case of discrepancies.
Note 2: the altimetry may not correspond exactly to the real values. For routes obtained via Google API, it is possible that the altitude is that of the terrain, without considering the presence of any tunnels or viaducts. If, however, the route was obtained from GPS tracking (for example with sports watches), the error is arbitrary and may depend both on the GPS coverage at the time it was recorded and on the performance of the device used.
Note 3: the percentage slope is found by calculating considering sections of at least 50 meters and is subsequently subjected to a "smoothing" process to reduce the possibility of artifacts and obtain a more realistic trend. For classification purposes, roads with gradients between -3% and +3% are considered flat, those with gradients between +3% and +7% are uphill, and those with gradients greater than +7% are considered steep. The same classification applies to descents. This classification is to be considered arbitrary and is a choice of goandrace.com.