flag

Energy2Run Cancano, 2024 course map and altimetry

Energy2Run Cancano: 2024 route, altimetry, gpx

Note: "Energy2Run Cancano" is NOT organized by goandrace.com

Energy2Run Cancano course map. Lenght: 18 km (11.2 mi).

On this page is shown the 18 km (11.2 mi) course map of the event "Energy2Run Cancano" in Laghi di Cancano, in the Province of Sondrio (Sunday, August 25, 2024). Explore the route!

Do you want to fly over the path with a Google Earth 3D video? Click on the following link: Energy2Run Cancano, fly over the path (3D video).

Download the gps race path by clicking here. You can send the .gpx file to your Garmin watch or other compatible device and follow the path. For instructions on how to upload the GPX file onto your Garmin watch click here.
NB: it is possible that the length calculated from the gpx file is greater than that of the race, with an error typically of 1-2%, so for example a half-marathon could be 2-300 meters longer.

Click the following link to visit the Energy2Run Cancano event page.

Energy2Run Cancano: route altimetric information


Energy2Run Cancano: GNR-GAP index (v 1.0, experimental, see more)

Energy2Run Cancano: interactive route

You can set the km (or mile) markers and you can select different types of layers (Satellite or Openstreetmap).

Energy2Run Cancano: altimetry graph

Energy2Run Cancano: slope graph

Energy2Run Cancano: percentage distribution of slope

Energy2Run Cancano: Km by km route altimetry analysis

Lap Start Alt. End Alt. Diff. Alt. Aver. Slope Min Alt. Max Alt. Tot Climb Tot Descent
KM 0-1 1917 1952 +35 +3.5% 1917 1952 39 4
KM 1-2 1952 1962 +10 +1.0% 1952 1962 11 1
KM 2-3 1962 1970 +8 +0.8% 1962 1975 12 4
KM 3-4 1970 1946 -24 -2.4% 1947 1969 0 24
KM 4-5 1946 1945 -1 -0.1% 1943 1951 6 7
KM 5-6 1945 1951 +6 +0.6% 1944 1953 9 3
KM 6-7 1951 1966 +15 +1.5% 1951 1972 21 6
KM 7-8 1966 1956 -10 -1.0% 1952 1965 4 14
KM 8-9 1956 1955 -1 -0.1% 1954 1956 0 1
KM 9-10 1955 1952 -3 -0.3% 1952 1955 2 5
KM 10-11 1952 1949 -3 -0.3% 1948 1952 1 4
KM 11-12 1949 1950 +1 +0.1% 1949 1950 1 0
KM 12-13 1950 1955 +5 +0.5% 1948 1963 10 5
KM 13-14 1955 1948 -7 -0.7% 1944 1953 5 12
KM 14-15 1948 1950 +2 +0.2% 1947 1952 2 0
KM 15-16 1950 1969 +19 +1.9% 1947 1968 21 2
KM 16-17 1969 1947 -22 -2.2% 1947 1972 0 22
KM 17-18 1947 1945 -2 -0.2% 1941 1949 3 5
KM 18-18.12 1945 1949 +4 +0.4% 1945 1949 8 0

GNR-GAP index - Go&Race Algorithm Estimate

Based on the elevation profile analysis, running on this course is estimated to result in a pace that is 1.5% slower.

For example, a runner who maintains a pace of 5'00"/km (8'03"/mi) on a flat 18.12 km course, corresponding to a finish time of 1h30'34", is estimated to complete this course in 1h31'55". The recalculated average pace (GAP) improves to 5'04"/km (8'10"/mi), making it 0'04"/km (0'07"/mi) slower.


The following graph illustrates the Pace Adjustment (PA) factor applied to the pace along the course. The horizontal red line represents a PA of 1, meaning no pace adjustment. Above the line, the pace is slower; below the line, it is faster. The table below also provides estimates for other pace ranges.




ANALYZE YOUR PERFORMANCE!
This table shows the estimated times for paces between 3 and 6'/km.
Use the table to analyze your performance or plan your race by estimating your equivalent time on a flat course. Check the "GAP"column: find the value closest to your pace. Or compare the "Time with slopes" column with your time: on the same row you will find the equivalent pace and time on a flat course in the "Pace" and "Time without slopes" columns.
Example: a time of 1h22'43" (pace of 4'34"/km or 7'21"/mi) corresponds to a time of 1h21'31" on a flat course (pace of 4'30"/km or 7'15"/mi).

Pace (min/km) Pace (min/mile) Time without slopes (hh:mm:ss) Time with slopes (hh:mm:ss) GAP (min/km) Δ Pace (min/km) GAP (min/mile) Δ Pace (min/mile)
3'00"4'50"0h54'20"0h55'09"3'03"0'03"4'54"0'04"
3'10"5'06"0h57'22"0h58'13"3'13"0'03"5'10"0'05"
3'20"5'22"1h00'23"1h01'16"3'23"0'03"5'27"0'05"
3'30"5'38"1h03'24"1h04'20"3'33"0'03"5'43"0'05"
3'40"5'54"1h06'25"1h07'24"3'43"0'03"5'59"0'05"
3'50"6'10"1h09'26"1h10'28"3'53"0'03"6'16"0'05"
4'00"6'26"1h12'27"1h13'32"4'04"0'04"6'32"0'06"
4'10"6'42"1h15'29"1h16'36"4'14"0'04"6'48"0'06"
4'20"6'58"1h18'30"1h19'39"4'24"0'04"7'05"0'06"
4'30"7'15"1h21'31"1h22'43"4'34"0'04"7'21"0'06"
4'40"7'31"1h24'32"1h25'47"4'44"0'04"7'37"0'07"
4'50"7'47"1h27'33"1h28'51"4'54"0'04"7'54"0'07"
5'00"8'03"1h30'34"1h31'55"5'04"0'04"8'10"0'07"
5'10"8'19"1h33'36"1h34'59"5'15"0'05"8'26"0'07"
5'20"8'35"1h36'37"1h38'02"5'25"0'05"8'43"0'08"
5'30"8'51"1h39'38"1h41'06"5'35"0'05"8'59"0'08"
5'40"9'07"1h42'39"1h44'10"5'45"0'05"9'15"0'08"
5'50"9'23"1h45'40"1h47'14"5'55"0'05"9'32"0'08"
6'00"9'39"1h48'41"1h50'18"6'05"0'05"9'48"0'09"
6'10"9'55"1h51'43"1h53'22"6'15"0'05"10'04"0'09"
6'20"10'12"1h54'44"1h56'26"6'26"0'06"10'21"0'09"
6'30"10'28"1h57'45"1h59'29"6'36"0'06"10'37"0'09"
6'40"10'44"2h00'46"2h02'33"6'46"0'06"10'53"0'10"
6'50"10'60"2h03'47"2h05'37"6'56"0'06"11'10"0'10"
7'00"11'16"2h06'48"2h08'41"7'06"0'06"11'26"0'10"
7'10"11'32"2h09'50"2h11'45"7'16"0'06"11'42"0'10"
7'20"11'48"2h12'51"2h14'49"7'27"0'07"11'59"0'10"
7'30"12'04"2h15'52"2h17'52"7'37"0'07"12'15"0'11"
7'40"12'20"2h18'53"2h20'56"7'47"0'07"12'31"0'11"
7'50"12'36"2h21'54"2h24'00"7'57"0'07"12'48"0'11"
8'00"12'52"2h24'55"2h27'04"8'07"0'07"13'04"0'11"

Notes on the calculation of the length of the route, on the altimetry and on the slope

Note 1: the length of the route is calculated using the geographic coordinates of the points that compose it, thanks to a specific formula. This value may differ slightly from the official length declared by the organizers of the race, which is valid in case of discrepancies.
Note 2: the altimetry may not correspond exactly to the real values. For routes obtained via Google API, it is possible that the altitude is that of the terrain, without considering the presence of any tunnels or viaducts. If, however, the route was obtained from GPS tracking (for example with sports watches), the error is arbitrary and may depend both on the GPS coverage at the time it was recorded and on the performance of the device used.
Note 3: the percentage slope is found by calculating considering sections of at least 50 meters and is subsequently subjected to a "smoothing" process to reduce the possibility of artifacts and obtain a more realistic trend. For classification purposes, roads with gradients between -3% and +3% are considered flat, those with gradients between +3% and +7% are uphill, and those with gradients greater than +7% are considered steep. The same classification applies to descents. This classification is to be considered arbitrary and is a choice of goandrace.com.