flag

Trail degli antichi lavatoi, 2024 course map and altimetry

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: 2024 route, altimetry, gpx

Note: "Trail degli antichi lavatoi" is NOT organized by goandrace.com

Trail degli antichi lavatoi course map. Lenght: 50.953 km (31.7 mi).

50.953 km (31.7 mi) course map of the event "Trail degli antichi lavatoi" in Sant'Ermo, in the Province of Pisa (Sunday, May 19, 2024). Explore the route!

Do you want to fly over the path with a Google Earth 3D video? Click on the following link: Trail degli antichi lavatoi, fly over the path (3D video).

GPS track - .gpx file download

Download the gps race path by clicking here. You can send the .gpx file to your Garmin watch or other compatible device and follow the path. For instructions on how to upload the GPX file onto your Garmin watch click here.

 .gpx file download

NB: it is possible that the length calculated from the gpx file is greater than that of the race, with an error typically of 1-2%, so for example a half-marathon could be 2-300 meters longer.

Click the following link to visit the Trail degli antichi lavatoi event page.

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: route altimetric information


Trail degli antichi lavatoi: GNR-GAP index (v 1.0, experimental, see more)

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: interactive route

You can set the km (or mile) markers and you can select different types of layers (Satellite or Openstreetmap).

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: altimetry graph

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: slope graph

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: percentage distribution of slope

Trail degli antichi lavatoi: Km by km route altimetry analysis

Lap Start Alt. End Alt. Diff. Alt. Aver. Slope Min Alt. Max Alt. Tot Climb Tot Descent
KM 0.0085-1 185 240 +55 +5.5% 185 240 55 0
KM 1-2 240 213 -28 -2.8% 217 256 13 40
KM 2-3 213 199 -13 -1.3% 169 218 41 54
KM 3-4 199 282 +82 +8.2% 196 280 83 1
KM 4-5 282 324 +42 +4.2% 282 327 44 2
KM 5-6 324 298 -26 -2.6% 254 324 44 70
KM 6-7 298 360 +63 +6.3% 300 360 63 0
KM 7-8 360 405 +45 +4.5% 361 416 53 8
KM 8-9 405 445 +40 +4.0% 405 442 45 5
KM 9-10 445 464 +19 +1.9% 447 469 22 3
KM 10-11 464 399 -66 -6.6% 388 463 9 75
KM 11-12 399 461 +62 +6.2% 385 460 72 10
KM 12-13 461 496 +35 +3.5% 461 505 55 20
KM 13-14 496 560 +64 +6.4% 492 559 67 3
KM 14-15 560 568 +8 +0.8% 561 585 25 17
KM 15-16 568 477 -91 -9.1% 476 567 0 91
KM 16-17 477 466 -11 -1.1% 441 477 23 34
KM 17-18 466 439 -27 -2.7% 438 465 2 29
KM 18-19 439 439 +1 +0.1% 435 441 7 6
KM 19-20 439 415 -24 -2.4% 413 440 2 26
KM 20-21 415 432 +17 +1.7% 411 438 25 8
KM 21-22 432 450 +18 +1.8% 432 459 26 8
KM 22-23 450 436 -14 -1.4% 433 449 5 19
KM 23-24 436 438 +2 +0.2% 421 441 15 13
KM 24-25 438 552 +114 +11.4% 438 552 114 0
KM 25-26 552 545 -7 -0.7% 536 570 26 33
KM 26-27 545 537 -8 -0.8% 526 549 13 21
KM 27-28 537 473 -64 -6.4% 473 537 0 64
KM 28-29 473 468 -5 -0.5% 466 490 15 20
KM 29-30 468 436 -32 -3.2% 436 467 3 35
KM 30-31 436 407 -29 -2.9% 407 436 0 29
KM 31-32 407 367 -40 -4.0% 366 406 0 40
KM 32-33 367 317 -50 -5.0% 317 367 0 50
KM 33-34 317 263 -54 -5.4% 258 317 9 63
KM 34-35 263 284 +21 +2.1% 223 281 61 40
KM 35-36 284 264 -20 -2.0% 264 321 35 55
KM 36-37 264 212 -52 -5.2% 214 264 0 52
KM 37-38 212 151 -62 -6.2% 149 207 2 64
KM 38-39 151 275 +124 +12.4% 151 275 124 0
KM 39-40 275 342 +67 +6.7% 275 349 69 2
KM 40-41 342 322 -20 -2.0% 280 343 42 62
KM 41-42 322 278 -44 -4.4% 279 342 16 60
KM 42-43 278 178 -100 -10.0% 181 278 0 100
KM 43-44 178 152 -27 -2.7% 144 175 21 48
KM 44-45 152 111 -41 -4.1% 111 150 0 41
KM 45-46 111 85 -26 -2.6% 85 110 0 26
KM 46-47 85 102 +17 +1.7% 80 101 22 5
KM 47-48 102 198 +97 +9.7% 103 198 97 0
KM 48-49 198 242 +43 +4.3% 206 253 55 11
KM 49-50 242 193 -48 -4.8% 196 241 2 50
KM 50-50.95 193 143 -50 -5.0% 143 193 0 1000

GNR-GAP index - Go&Race Algorithm Estimate

Based on the elevation profile analysis, running on this course is estimated to result in a pace that is 12.8% slower.


For example, a runner who maintains a pace of 5'00"/km (8'03"/mi) on a flat 50.8 km course, corresponding to a finish time of 4h14'02", is estimated to complete this course in 4h46'37". The recalculated average pace (GAP) improves to 5'38"/km (9'05"/mi), making it 0'38"/km (1'02"/mi) slower.


The following graph illustrates the Pace Adjustment (PA) factor applied to the pace along the course. The horizontal red line represents a PA of 1, meaning no pace adjustment. Above the line, the pace is slower; below the line, it is faster. The table below also provides estimates for other pace ranges.



Predict your race or analyze your performance!

This following table shows simulations for paces between 3 and 8'/km.


RACE PREDICTION
To estimate a possible race time, use the "Pace" or "Time without slopes" column, which are valid for a flat course.
For example, if you think you can cover this distance on a flat course at a pace of 4'40"/km (or 7'31"/mi), i.e. in a time of 3h57'05", the estimate is to complete this course in 4h27'30", corresponding to a pace of 5'16"/km (or 8'28"/mi).

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
If you have run this race, use the table to estimate the equivalent time on a flat course. Check the "GAP" column and find the value closest to your pace, or compare the "Time with slopes" column with your time: on the same row you will find the pace and the equivalent time on a flat course in the "Pace" and "Time without slopes" columns.
For example, a time of 4h17'57" (pace of 5'05"/km or 8'10"/mi) corresponds to a time of 3h48'37" on a flat course (pace of 4'30"/km or 7'15"/mi).

Pace (min/km) Pace (min/mile) Time without slopes (hh:mm:ss) Time with slopes (hh:mm:ss) GAP (min/km) Δ Pace (min/km) GAP (min/mile) Δ Pace (min/mile)
3'00"4'50"2h32'25"2h51'58"3'23"0'23"5'27"0'37"
3'10"5'06"2h40'53"3h01'31"3'34"0'24"5'45"0'39"
3'20"5'22"2h49'21"3h11'04"3'46"0'26"6'03"0'41"
3'30"5'38"2h57'49"3h20'38"3'57"0'27"6'21"0'43"
3'40"5'54"3h06'17"3h30'11"4'08"0'28"6'39"0'45"
3'50"6'10"3h14'45"3h39'44"4'20"0'30"6'58"0'47"
4'00"6'26"3h23'13"3h49'17"4'31"0'31"7'16"0'50"
4'10"6'42"3h31'41"3h58'51"4'42"0'32"7'34"0'52"
4'20"6'58"3h40'09"4h08'24"4'53"0'33"7'52"0'54"
4'30"7'15"3h48'37"4h17'57"5'05"0'35"8'10"0'56"
4'40"7'31"3h57'05"4h27'30"5'16"0'36"8'28"0'58"
4'50"7'47"4h05'33"4h37'04"5'27"0'37"8'47"0'60"
5'00"8'03"4h14'02"4h46'37"5'38"0'38"9'05"1'02"
5'10"8'19"4h22'30"4h56'10"5'50"0'40"9'23"1'04"
5'20"8'35"4h30'58"5h05'43"6'01"0'41"9'41"1'06"
5'30"8'51"4h39'26"5h15'17"6'12"0'42"9'59"1'08"
5'40"9'07"4h47'54"5h24'50"6'24"0'44"10'17"1'10"
5'50"9'23"4h56'22"5h34'23"6'35"0'45"10'36"1'12"
6'00"9'39"5h04'50"5h43'56"6'46"0'46"10'54"1'14"
6'10"9'55"5h13'18"5h53'30"6'57"0'47"11'12"1'16"
6'20"10'12"5h21'46"6h03'03"7'09"0'49"11'30"1'18"
6'30"10'28"5h30'14"6h12'36"7'20"0'50"11'48"1'21"
6'40"10'44"5h38'42"6h22'09"7'31"0'51"12'06"1'23"
6'50"10'60"5h47'10"6h31'43"7'43"0'53"12'24"1'25"
7'00"11'16"5h55'38"6h41'16"7'54"0'54"12'43"1'27"
7'10"11'32"6h04'06"6h50'49"8'05"0'55"13'01"1'29"
7'20"11'48"6h12'34"7h00'22"8'16"0'56"13'19"1'31"
7'30"12'04"6h21'03"7h09'56"8'28"0'58"13'37"1'33"
7'40"12'20"6h29'31"7h19'29"8'39"0'59"13'55"1'35"
7'50"12'36"6h37'59"7h29'02"8'50"1'00"14'13"1'37"
8'00"12'52"6h46'27"7h38'35"9'02"1'02"14'32"1'39"

Notes on the calculation of the length of the route, on the altimetry and on the slope

Note 1: the length of the route is calculated using the geographic coordinates of the points that compose it, thanks to a specific formula. This value may differ slightly from the official length declared by the organizers of the race, which is valid in case of discrepancies.
Note 2: the altimetry may not correspond exactly to the real values. For routes obtained via Google API, it is possible that the altitude is that of the terrain, without considering the presence of any tunnels or viaducts. If, however, the route was obtained from GPS tracking (for example with sports watches), the error is arbitrary and may depend both on the GPS coverage at the time it was recorded and on the performance of the device used.
Note 3: the percentage slope is found by calculating considering sections of at least 50 meters and is subsequently subjected to a "smoothing" process to reduce the possibility of artifacts and obtain a more realistic trend. For classification purposes, roads with gradients between -3% and +3% are considered flat, those with gradients between +3% and +7% are uphill, and those with gradients greater than +7% are considered steep. The same classification applies to descents. This classification is to be considered arbitrary and is a choice of goandrace.com.